Proof Step: c_0_32

name: c_0_32 syntax: thf role: negated_conjecture inference: evalgc

Proof State Overview

proof_step c_0_1 ⊕ ordinal_wo_oexp_b_a bot_bo1343651123od_b_b r = bot_bo1798880249_b_a_b c_0_27 ⊖ ordinal_wo_oexp_b_a bot_bo1343651123od_b_b r = bot_bo1798880249_b_a_b c_0_1->c_0_27 c_0_2 c_0_2 c_0_28 ⊕ ordinal_wo_oexp_b_a X3 X2 = bot_bo1798880249_b_a_b ⊕ field_a X2 = bot_bot_set_a ⊖ field_b X3 = bot_bot_set_b ⊖ ordinal_wo_rel2_b_a X3 X2 c_0_2->c_0_28 c_0_3 ⊕ field_b bot_bo1343651123od_b_b = bot_bot_set_b c_0_24 ⊕ field_b bot_bo1343651123od_b_b = bot_bot_set_b c_0_3->c_0_24 c_0_5 ⊖ field_a r = bot_bot_set_a c_0_29 ⊖ field_a r = bot_bot_set_a c_0_5->c_0_29 c_0_32 ⊖ ordinal_wo_rel2_b_a bot_bo1343651123od_b_b r c_0_27->c_0_32 c_0_28->c_0_32 c_0_24->c_0_32 c_0_29->c_0_32 c_0_33 ⊕ $false c_0_32->c_0_33

Input Dependencies

c_0_1 c_0_2 c_0_3 c_0_5

Assumptions

c_0_27 c_0_28 c_0_24 c_0_29

Conclusion

c_0_32

Dependents

c_0_33

Formula

~ ( ordinal_wo_rel2_b_a @ bot_bo1343651123od_b_b @ r )

Source

inference(evalgc,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_24])]),c_0_29])])